If any, whose wrestler's in ring dominance you don't find believable and vice versa?

Interesting question, I've never really thought about that, I'm a fan of TNA, and in my oppinon they book very well, so I usually "believe" what's going on even though you know it's scripted and yadada, but I think that it has to do a lot with how the performers sell what happens, it's kind of the same thing with botched moves. If someone screws up a move on their opponent, but the opponent makes it look like it hurt then it just becomes an innovative move. I do however keep up with WWE enough to know what's happening and Shamus is not main event talent, he just isn't. So it's understandable to not think he can match up with Cena when he just shows up and wins the title. I don't like Cena's in ring work but at least he has charisma, but anyway, I think it mainly has to do with how good the wrestlers are at selling the match, the other part of it would be bad booking.